← Back to Archive View Original Source ↗

The Cartel of Secrecy: How the Scottish State's Criminal Conspiracy Bankrupted Alex Salmond, Shielded Its Cronies, and Risks Contempt of Court to Bury the Truth

Published on 18 January 2026 | Deep link: ://iq2qq.com{postSlug || ''}

As the clock ticks toward 22 January 2026, the Scottish Government finds itself backed into a corner of its own making. The Scottish Information Commissioner, David Hamilton—a former police officer with unassailable expertise in data protection—has issued a stark ultimatum: release the withheld written evidence from the 2021 James Hamilton inquiry into Nicola Sturgeon's handling of harassment complaints against Alex Salmond, or face referral to the Court of Session for potential contempt of court. This latest escalation, stemming from a missed 15 January deadline and a pattern of "last-minute communication" that Hamilton condemned as disrespectful to the public and reflective of poor ministerial standards, isn't an anomaly. It's the forensic fingerprint of a regime rotten to its core—a cartel of secrecy that has weaponized state institutions to orchestrate a witch hunt, financially ruin a national hero, and collude in a grand conspiracy to derail Scottish independence.

This post dismantles the evasion brick by brick, drawing on documented inquiries, ongoing police probes, financial records, and legal precedents to expose not just bureaucratic stonewalling, but a calculated criminal collusion involving the Scottish Government, SNP leadership, Crown Office, and potentially the broader British state apparatus. The stakes? A £3 million misfeasance lawsuit, perjury investigations, and the erosion of public trust that could spell the end for the current regime. Let's autopsy this scandal, starting with the fresh wound of the commissioner's threat and tracing it back to the poisoned roots.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cgk8n18zpy8o

https://archive.ph/0ClHv

The Immediate Flashpoint: A Government Flirting with Contempt

On 15 January 2026, the Scottish Government was ordered to disclose all written evidence submitted to James Hamilton's 2021 inquiry, which cleared Sturgeon of deliberately breaching the ministerial code but highlighted a "genuine failure of recollection" regarding her meetings with Salmond. The government balked, notifying Hamilton minutes before the deadline that compliance was impossible due to ongoing redactions to prevent "jigsaw identification"—a risk of piecing together anonymized details to identify individuals, potentially breaching court orders.

Hamilton's response was forensic and unforgiving: he initiated non-compliance procedures, set a final 22 January deadline, and warned that failure would trigger a Court of Session referral. This could lead to contempt findings, fines, or worse, branding ministers as law-breakers in a case of "significant public interest." The government, under First Minister John Swinney, has appealed the order, with a hearing possibly slated for 29 January. But this legal guerrilla warfare ignores the December 2023 Court of Session precedent, which rejected their claims that the information wasn't theirs to release or that independence shielded it from Freedom of Information (FOI) laws.

Why risk contempt? The Duty of Candour—Scotland's legal and ethical requirement for public bodies to be transparent about errors—demands openness. By defying it, the government acts extra-legally, suggesting the files contain dynamite: perhaps more evidence of the complete breakdown in barriers between government, party, and prosecution that Salmond alleged. If Hamilton, the data protection guardian, deems them safe for release, the "jigsaw" excuse crumbles as a bad-faith stall, buying time until the May 2026 Holyrood elections or public memory dims.

The Core Conspiracy: A Witch Hunt to Decapitate Independence

Alex Salmond, the revered architect of the Scottish independence movement who led the SNP to power and nearly won the 2014 referendum, consistently framed his ordeal as a "malicious and concerted" plot to end his career and imprison him. Acquitted of all 13 sexual offence charges in March 2020, Salmond's 2019 judicial review victory exposed the government's internal probe as "unlawful," "procedurally unfair," and "tainted by apparent bias," awarding him over £512,000 in costs.

The 2021 Holyrood inquiry labeled it a "corporate failure," with a majority concluding Sturgeon misled parliament on when she learned of complaints. Salmond testified to coordinated efforts: senior figures "fishing" for complainants, leaks to media (probed under Operation Newbiggin, closed in 2024 but with commissioner "sympathy" for a government source), and abuse of state organs. The Crown Office, Scotland's prosecution service, acted as enforcer, censoring Salmond's Holyrood submission post-publication in an "abuse of legislation."

Salmond's allies hinted at deeper collusion—a "state within a state" with British state overlap. The 2018 probe timing, amid post-Brexit indy surges, suggests political interdiction. UK Conservative MP David Davis, using parliamentary privilege in 2021, read out barred evidence accusing Sturgeon's chief of staff Liz Lloyd of meddling—claims Salmond couldn't air in Scotland. If a British establishment figure like Davis risks exposure, it points to an invisible Unionist hand fueling SNP infighting to strangle separatism.

The Smoking Gun: Perjury Probes and Criminal Overreach

Enter Operation Broadcroft, Police Scotland's ongoing investigation—active as of June 2025—into whether senior civil servant James Hynd gave a "false statement" under oath during the Salmond inquiry. Hynd, who drafted the flawed complaints policy, faces allegations of perjury, misleading the court, and concealing documents. Salmond lodged this complaint before his October 2024 death; its persistence post-mortem underscores the gravity. If Broadcroft yields charges, it elevates "mismanagement" to criminal perversion of justice, potentially implicating a chain of command.

This isn't isolated: Operation Branchform's slow burn on SNP financial irregularities (missing £600,000 donations) contrasts with the state's zeal in pursuing Salmond. Why efficiency in character assassination but delays in party probes? It reeks of selective justice, shielding insiders while targeting threats.

Financial Hypocrisy: State-Sponsored Attrition and Double Standards

The human cost is forensic proof of malice. Salmond's estate entered sequestration in November 2025—debts exceeding £344,000 (mostly legal fees) against £2,000 in assets—forcing a trustee to manage, including valuing his £3 million misfeasance suit. Widow Moira and family, including niece Christina Hendry, continue the action—paused until at least 21 January for adjustments—vowing to "defend his name" with potential millionaire backers.

Contrast this with Peter Murrell, Sturgeon's estranged husband and ex-SNP CEO, granted solemn legal aid on 30 April 2025 for embezzlement charges despite a six-figure salary and £107,000 loaned to the SNP in 2021 (£60,000 unpaid, possibly written off). Scottish Labour's Jackie Baillie called it "galling"; Joanna Cherry KC deemed it "absolutely astonishing." Taxpayers fund Murrell's defense—trial unlikely before 2026 elections—while the state bled Salmond dry. This double standard: bankruptcy for truth-seekers, bailouts for elites.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cz0px25y2jxo

The government spent £73,000+ fighting FOI releases on this saga alone, part of a pattern: deleted WhatsApps, opaque budgets risking services, quangos flouting transparency. Audit Scotland decries it as democracy-damaging; the commissioner documents chronic non-compliance.

The Independence Paradox and Imminent Reckoning

Salmond's ghost haunts: a highly respected indy icon, his witch hunt fractured the movement he built. The current SNP's omertà—institutional Alzheimer's erasing history—poses the real barrier to independence, eroding trust in Scottish institutions.

But walls close in. Broadcroft could indict officials; missing 22 January invites contempt; the misfeasance suit endures. Too many—Davis, the family, watchdogs—are onto it. Karma arrives not as vengeance, but justice: a reckoning in the Court of Session, exposing the cartel and reviving Salmond's dream.

Scotland, demand the files. Verify the rot via the commissioner's decisions. The truth, unbankruptible, rises.

References

(Additional context drawn from Scottish Information Commissioner's official reports and Audit Scotland critiques.)

https://iq2qq.wordpress.com/2025/08/09/devious-nicola-sturgeon-continues-to-stab-deceased-alex-salmond-in-the-face-sturgeon-moon-time/

https://iq2qq.wordpress.com/2025/03/23/scotlands-integrity-undermined-operation-branchforms-outcome-raises-suspicions-of-subversion/

https://iq2qq.wordpress.com/2025/03/11/operation-branchform-betrayal-delay-and-the-unions-hidden-hand/

https://iq2qq.wordpress.com/2025/03/13/dismantling-the-bbcs-messiah-myth-alex-salmond-not-nicola-sturgeon-is-scotlands-true-giant/

https://iq2qq.wordpress.com/2025/03/22/the-snp-and-scottish-state-infiltrated-by-the-u-s-u-k-deep-state/

https://iq2qq.wordpress.com/2025/07/04/top-earning-former-snp-executive-peter-murrell-to-receive-legal-aid/

https://iq2qq.wordpress.com/2025/08/18/alex-salmonds-widow-to-continue-litigation-against-the-scottish-government/