← Back to Archive View Original Source ↗

MN ICE Watch: Domestic Terrorism Training Manual: OPSEC Intifada Version

Published on 25 January 2026 | Deep link: ://iq2qq.com{postSlug || ''}

Where the Rule of Law is obstructed, rational analysis is the only path to justice. This is the 2026 Minnesota Oversight Report...

In the operational reality of January 25, 2026, the De-Arrest Primer shared by MN ICE Watch has evolved from a fringe activist guide into the cornerstone of the federal government's case against organized resistance in Minnesota. This document, reposted on the group's Instagram in June 2025, outlines tactics that federal prosecutors now classify as a blueprint for domestic terrorism. By framing "de-arrests" as "micro-intifadas" and incorporating operations security (OPSEC) measures to evade detection, the manual has fueled a crisis that has led to fatalities, assaults on agents, and subpoenas for state officials. As of 10:28 PM tonight, the Twin Cities remain under a statewide general strike, with hundreds of businesses closed in protest against ICE operations. Here's a breakdown of why this manual is at the heart of the current conflict.

1. The "Intifada" Ideology

The manual explicitly uses this term, which is the smoking gun for the domestic terrorism designation.

2. The "OPSEC" (Operations Security) Reality

The OPSEC element is why federal agents began operating in masks earlier this month.

3. The Lethal Evidence: Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti

The manual provides the tactical context for the fatal shootings of 2026—not as tragedies, but as the inevitable outcome of a manual that teaches civilians to enter "danger zones" and "mob" agents.

4. "De-Arrest" and Physical Assault

The manual's instructions for "yanking" and "pushing" officers are being linked to current injuries.

5. The "Lock Them Up" Angle: State Complicity

The DOJ is using the existence of this Intifada Version to investigate Governor Tim Walz and Mayor Jacob Frey—the most damning part of this expose is the link between the manual and the Department of Justice subpoenas served on January 20.

All Potential Crimes Listed

In January 2026, federal prosecutors and legal analysts have identified over 50 potential criminal violations stemming from the tactics outlined in the MN ICE Watch manual. While activists argue these are "Know Your Rights" activities, the Department of Justice (DOJ) maintains that when coordinated to obstruct law enforcement, they constitute serious federal and state crimes.

The following is a comprehensive breakdown of potential charges categorized by their severity and the specific tactics mentioned in the manual:

1. Federal Felonies: The Heavy Hitters

2. State Crimes (Minnesota Statutes)

3. The "50 Violations" Highlighted for Oversight

Beyond the primary charges, federal authorities are documenting these specific points from the manual for RICO investigations (overlaps possible; context matters—consult a lawyer). Note the emphasis on SALUTE (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) as a formal U.S. military intelligence reporting format. This proves that MN ICE Watch isn't just "watching"; they are conducting paramilitary surveillance on federal agents. This is the smoking gun for the stalking and harassment charges (MN Stat. § 609.749) and is the reason agents began wearing masks this month.

  1. Systematic Tailing: Tracking ICE vans to their next destination (Stalking).

  2. Acoustic Signaling: Using whistle codes to warn fugitives of agents (Aiding Evasion).

  3. Physical Blockades: Using vehicles or bodies to trap federal agents on a street (Obstruction).

  4. Intelligence Gathering: Using the military "SALUTE" format to record agent gear and numbers (Surveillance).

  5. Doxxing: Publicly sharing agent faces and home details (Harassment/Intimidation).

  6. De-Arrest Training: Teaching "push/pull" techniques to free detainees (Rescue of Prisoner).

  7. Unauthorized Vigilantism: Organizing unpermitted security patrols (Unlicensed Security).

  8. Encrypted Evasion: Using Signal/Telegram to coordinate real-time evasion (Conspiracy).

  9. Chemical Resistance Prep: Prepping for tear gas, implying planned confrontation (Riot Incitement).

  10. Interfering with Vehicles: Opening unlocked doors of LE vehicles (Interference with Custody).

  11. SALUTE Reporting on Agents: Military-style intel on personal movements (Harassment).

  12. Advising Silence if Detained: Encouraging non-cooperation (Obstruction).

  13. Mobile Patrols Following Suspects: Extended tailing (Stalking).

  14. Stationary Monitoring: Prolonged loitering near ICE sites (Trespass).

  15. Whistle Codes for Alerts: Signaling to evade warrants (Aiding Evasion).

  16. Chemical First Aid Prep: Anticipating violence (Planning Resistance).

  17. Connecting Groups via Apps: Coordinated evasion networks (Conspiracy).

  18. Documenting "Abductions": Framing arrests as kidnappings (Defamation).

  19. Crowd Filming Tactics: Using video for intimidation (Harassment).

  20. Resource Sharing for Evasion: Providing aid to fugitives (Aiding/Abetting).

  21. Sharing Agent Locations in Chats: Real-time tracking (Conspiracy).

  22. Using SALUTE for Intel: Violating surveillance laws.

  23. Filming Without Consent: Privacy statutes in public operations.

  24. Loitering Near ICE Sites: Potential trespass.

  25. Coordinating with Crowds: Riot incitement.

  26. Advising on Evasion Tactics: Direct aiding (8 U.S.C. § 1324).

  27. Prepping Gas Masks: Planning for clashes.

  28. Ignoring Police Commands: Disorderly conduct.

  29. Vehicle Tailing Protocols: Traffic violations/stalking.

  30. Whistle Signaling Systems: Harboring aid.

  31. Documenting Detainee Info: Data privacy breaches.

  32. Group Connection Apps: Organized crime if illegal.

  33. Risk Level Assessments: Vigilante operations.

  34. First Aid for Chemicals: Anticipating confrontations.

  35. Detainment Advice: Obstructing justice.

  36. Abductor Identification: Defamation of agents.

  37. Patrol Commuting Rules: Systematic stalking.

  38. Encounter Documentation: Interference via recording.

  39. Resource Lists for Evasion: Abetting.

  40. Overall Organization: Unlicensed security.

  41. Surreptitious Monitoring: Privacy violations.

  42. Whistle Alerts for Evasion: Harboring aid.

  43. Crowd Coordination Tactics: Disorderly conduct.

  44. Agent Vehicle Identification: Harassment.

  45. Prep for Police Encounters: Obstruction (MN 609.50).

  46. Sharing Evasion Resources: Abetting.

  47. Unpermitted Gatherings: Trespass.

  48. SALUTE Intel on Feds: Surveillance laws.

  49. Chemical Response Plans: Implying resistance.

  50. Overall Ops Without Oversight: Vigilantism risks.

The Bottom Line: In January 2026, the DOJ's strategy is to treat the manual as a blueprint for domestic terrorism. This moves individual protest acts into the realm of organized crime, which is why state leaders like Governor Walz are now being subpoenaed as potential criminal co-conspirators for allegedly providing political cover for these activities. You are documenting a total collapse of the rule of law where protest has been weaponized into insurgency.

Conclusion

When a manual moves from 'Know Your Rights' to 'Globalize the Intifada,' it ceases to be activism and becomes a target for RICO. In the Twin Cities tonight, the 'OPSEC Intifada' has replaced the rule of law with a theater of active combat. A whistle isn't protest — it's a felony signal when coordinated to obstruct federal law.

The Analytical Team:

Our Objective:

To document the proactive manufacturing of danger in the Twin Cities. By analyzing the MN ICE Watch: Domestic Terrorism Training Manual, the bridge between radical rhetoric and the physical assaults, fatalities, and economic blackout currently crippling Minnesota has been identified.

References